Key highlights * More than 3 in 4 stock photos of sleeping babies show infants in environments with known risk factors for sudden unexpected infant death, according to new research from BabyCenter. * The most common problem with stock photos of sleeping babies is that the babies are shown with objects in their cribs, such as blankets and stuffed animals. * Each year, there are about 3,400 sudden unexpected infant deaths in the United States, with strangulation and suffocation in bed among the top reported causes. * To help remedy this problem, BabyCenter is offering the free use of photographs that show safe sleep practices for infants. You can access the collection on Flickr.
> “Major media outlets may use these images for stories about baby sleep – and when they do so, > they risk creating a false sense of security about practices that have been linked to sleep-related deaths,”
またスラドの偏向記事 (スコア:0)
ソースでは写真素材を提供してるサイトの赤ちゃんの写真がリスクあるものが多いから素材として記事などに使われ広まることに対して危惧してる。
しかしスラドの記事では「ネット上での赤ちゃんは危険な寝方してることが多い」と受け取られる記事になってる。
#最近ちょっと捏造多すぎ
いや、間違っていない (スコア:-1)
お前さんこそものすごい捏造してるぞ
タイトルからしてストーリーのとおりじゃないか…
> 3 in 4 stock photos of sleeping babies show them in an unsafe sleep space
> 3 Out of 4 Stock Photos of Sleeping Babies Show ‘Unsafe’ Spaces, Study Finds
ソースの内容も理解せずに "ソースでは" って相当恥ずかしいと思うんだが…誰もリンク先なんか見に行かないだろうと思ってる?
babycenter
Key highlights
* More than 3 in 4 stock photos of sleeping babies show infants in environments with known risk factors for sudden unexpected infant death, according to new research from BabyCenter.
* The most common problem with stock photos of sleeping babies is that the babies are shown with objects in their cribs, such as blankets and stuffed animals.
* Each year, there are about 3,400 sudden unexpected infant deaths in the United States, with strangulation and suffocation in bed among the top reported causes.
* To help remedy this problem, BabyCenter is offering the free use of photographs that show safe sleep practices for infants. You can access the collection on Flickr.
Peta Pixelの方は、BabyCenterの参照記事でだいたい同じ
Re: (スコア:0)
ソースにこう書かれてるのですが・・・
> “Major media outlets may use these images for stories about baby sleep – and when they do so,
> they risk creating a false sense of security about practices that have been linked to sleep-related deaths,”
Re:いや、間違っていない (スコア:0)
仰るとおりです
(そこは実は否定していないつもりで、元のコメントを読み違えて別の悪意として取ってしまっていたのですが、そんなの分かりませんよね)
「ネット上の赤ちゃんの写真」と「stock photosの写真」の件を踏まえて読めていない、2こめのご指摘が全てです
本当にすみません